In South Africa, the framework for inclusion already exists. On paper, the country has some of the most progressive policies on women’s rights and disability inclusion. But policy alone has never been the solution. Implementation is.
In a recent discussion with Cassius Selala from the Department of Women, Youth, and Persons with Disabilities, a familiar tension becomes clear. The gap between what is promised and what is experienced remains wide, especially for women and persons with disabilities who continue to sit on the margins of the economy.
The question is whether these policies are being executed adequately?
SMread: Government cuts fuel levy by R3 but South Africans say the pain is far from over
Structural inequality still shapes access
More than 30 years into democracy, the legacy of exclusion still shapes access to opportunity.
African women and people with disabilities remain disproportionately affected, particularly in rural and township contexts where inequality is layered and persistent.
The government has attempted to intervene through economic policy. One of the most notable efforts is the public procurement requirement that 40 percent of state contracts go to women, especially those who are disadvantaged or living with disabilities.
It is a strong policy lever, and in some areas, it has even worked. But consistency is the issue. Enforcement varies. Access is uneven. And where systems are weak, policy loses its power.
At a global level, South Africa has also pushed these issues forward through platforms like the G20.
Three priorities have been emphasised:
- The recognition of care work.
- The economic empowerment of women.
- The need to end gender based violence.
These are not separate conversations, they’re all connected.
SMread: Millions protest across America in latest No Kings rallies
Where inequality becomes most visible
The divide between rural and urban South Africa is one of the clearest indicators of how inequality works.
In rural areas, the lack of land ownership continues to limit women’s independence. Without assets, access to finance and long term stability becomes difficult. Economic participation is not just restricted, it is blocked within an unfair system.
In townships, the barriers look different but lead to the same outcome. High unemployment, limited infrastructure, and restricted access to capital create an environment where opportunity is narrow and competition is high.
Initiatives like the Women Economic Assembly, driven at a presidential level, aim to shift this by opening access to sectors such as infrastructure and technology.
SMread: Israel bans West Bank teachers from Jerusalem’s Christian schools
Gender based violence is also an economic issue
South Africa has formally declared gender based violence a national crisis. The response includes the National Strategic Plan on Gender Based Violence, which recognises economic empowerment as a central pillar.
This reflects an important change. Violence is not only a social issue. It is also an economic one.
Legal frameworks like the Domestic Violence Act exist and are actively used. Institutions such as Legal Aid South Africa and the Commission for Gender Equality continue to play an important role in supporting victims and driving accountability.
But these systems are under pressure. In many rural areas, access is still limited, and reporting is inconsistent.
What is becoming increasingly clear is the link between economic dependence and vulnerability. Where women do not own land or have independent income, the ability to leave unsafe environments becomes significantly harder.
Addressing gender based violence, then, requires more than legal enforcement. It requires economic access, asset ownership, and community level engagement that includes civil society, religious leaders, and local institutions.
SMread: Environmental activists push for renewables amid energy uncertainty
The real test is delivery
South Africa does not lack policy. It does not lack awareness. What it lacks is consistent delivery.
Economic empowerment remains one of the most direct ways to address both inequality and gender based violence. But without enforcement, resourcing, and accountability at a local level, progress will remain uneven.
Inclusion cannot remain a policy objective. It has to function as an economic strategy.
Until that change happens in practice, the gap between legislation and lived experience will continue to define the reality for millions.
Image via University of Waterloo.
