The United Kingdom has taken an unexpected turn in its policy on Israel, announcing a suspension of trade talks and imposing targeted sanctions on certain Israeli settler entities amid the deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza. This marks a notable shift in tone from one of Israel’s historically close allies, as growing political pressure and global concern over the violence push the UK to reevaluate its stance.
UK-based political commentator Dr. Abdul Wahid, however, cautions against reading too much into the move. Describing the developments, he noted, “What they have done effectively is the bare minimum to save face in front of their own supporters.” He pointed out that the individuals and groups now sanctioned were already considered illegal under international law. “So they should have been sanctioned long, long ago,” he added.
SMread: Gujarat: Demolition Drive Sparks Outcry
Are the Sanctions Enough?
While the Foreign Secretary’s use of language like “monstrous and morally unjustifiable” marks a departure from earlier, more guarded statements, many, like Wahid, believe that the UK’s actions are still outpaced by the gravity of the situation in Gaza. Over half the population is experiencing emergency levels of food insecurity, with humanitarian aid struggling to keep up.
Meanwhile, Britain continues to maintain robust economic and military ties with Israel, with trade exceeding £6 billion. Reconnaissance and intelligence-sharing operations also remain in place. “Let’s not forget that Britain was among the governments that helped Israel repel a drone and missile attack from Iran,” Wahid commented, highlighting that the UK still plays a significant strategic role.
The debate over Britain’s influence doesn’t end with its direct relationship with Israel. Wahid believes that the UK can exert regional influence, particularly through alliances such as its longstanding relationship with Jordan. “Jordan will not cooperate with the Zionist occupation if Britain tells it not to,” he noted, suggesting that diplomatic pressure could be a more effective tool.
As conversations emerge in the UK and other Western capitals about potentially recognizing a Palestinian state, Wahid expresses caution. Such recognition, he argues, risks becoming symbolic if not accompanied by sovereignty and self-determination. A fragmented entity under occupation control, in his view, would offer little relief or justice.
Wahid points to broader global dynamics, including US policy directions and the role of Arab governments. Nations such as Egypt, Turkey, and the UAE have faced criticism for maintaining economic or security ties with Israel despite public solidarity with the Palestinian cause.
Ultimately, Dr. Wahid advocates for long-term change rooted in justice and accountability. In his view, policy shifts, while potentially promising, must move beyond statements and gestures. The situation in Gaza, he reminds viewers, demands both urgency and sincerity.
For more on this, watch the video below:
